In The Act of Killing, a group of Indonesian men who were involved in mass killings in the 1960s reenact their brutal crimes for a documentary, giving a chilling glimpse into the mind of a killer. The film blurs the lines between reality and fantasy, forcing us to confront the horrifying depths of human cruelty.
Some fan theories suggest that these reenactments are a way for the men to justify their actions, turning them into heroes rather than criminals. Their willingness to relive their atrocities shows a deep detachment from the pain they caused.
What if these killers had been held accountable for their actions? Would they have changed, or continued to live in denial?
A key moment in the film occurs when one of the men breaks down, realizing the true weight of his actions. It’s a raw and emotional shift that forces us to confront the idea of guilt and redemption.
An alternate ending could have shown a confrontation with the victims’ families, seeking forgiveness or understanding. Or perhaps a prequel exploring the events leading up to the killings would give us deeper insight into the origins of such cruelty, leaving us to question how history shapes who we become.